|

Zero feathers

As a child and teenager, I suffered constant harassment for not conforming to binary gender expressions, for my abilities, and for my delicate swan-like poses. That violence affected my emotional and psychological well-being and led me to develop suicidal thoughts at a very early age. Cero Plumas was born as a response to that trauma and wound: it is an act of reparation and an attempt to rewrite my story from a place of dissent, affection, and memory.

The work unfolds from interventions in my family archive, from a reinterpretation of devices of power such as the colonial and military archives, and from dramatizations of inaccurate memories from childhood and adolescence. In this gesture, the body itself becomes a living archive: it reincarnates what was erased, reactivates memories that seemed impossible, and opens up a space where the personal becomes political.

Theoretically, the project engages with concepts such as gender coloniality proposed by Argentine philosopher María Lugones, showing how colonialism imposed a binary and hierarchical regime that erased the sex-gender plurality of indigenous peoples. It also ties in with cultural critic José Esteban Muñoz’s notion of disidentification, understood as the escape from fixed identity categories and the act of subverting labels in order to inhabit impossible interstices. Along the same lines, I find resonance in the ch’ixi, formulated by Andean thinker Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui: the coexistence of contradictory elements that live together without merging, and that reject any clean synthesis. I do not seek purity, but rather the power of contamination, where queer and indigenous languages are interwoven without hierarchies.

Plumophobia—violence against effeminate expression in men—is a central theme. Naming the project Zero Plumas (Zero Feathers) is a way of ironizing the disciplinary demand to “not be effeminate”: exposing it, subverting it, and restoring its power as a symbol of difference. This gesture intersects with writer Adrienne Rich’s critique of compulsory heterosexuality, highlighting how the hetero-cis norm has domesticated childhoods and bodies, confining them to obedience. In response, my interventions claim the right to inhabit ambiguity, to reappropriate normative aesthetics in order to dismantle them from within.